The latest figures reported by the US Commerce Department have the commentators furrowing their brows. The American economy apparently ‘shrank’ by 0.3% in the first quarter, a sharp reversal from the previous quarter’s 2.4% growth. Hand-wringing about recession risks inevitably follows. Yet, buried within the same report is a detail that seems contradictory: imports surged by over 40%.
How can an economy ‘shrink’ when it’s acquiring more stuff from the rest of the world? The answer lies in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) mechanics and interpretation.
Firstly, the stock accounting. GDP aims to measure the value of goods and services produced domestically. When Americans buy imported goods (Consumption), or companies invest in foreign machinery (Investment), or the government buys foreign supplies (Government Spending), these values are initially included in C, I, or G. To avoid counting foreign production as domestic, imports (M) are subtracted in the formula GDP = C + I + G + (X - M). This subtraction is an accounting adjustment to isolate domestic production, not necessarily a judgment that imports are inherently ‘bad’.
Secondly, the flow economic impact. Beyond the accounting, there’s the concept of ’leakage’. Money spent on imports flows out of the domestic economy. Unlike money spent on domestically produced goods and services, it doesn’t directly fund domestic wages or profits in the next round of the income-expenditure cycle. In this sense, a surge in import spending can dampen the domestic economic activity rate that GDP seeks to measure. This is the standard view: imports leak demand away from domestic producers.
But does this GDP figure, reflecting both the accounting adjustment and the leakage effect, truly capture the state of national well-being? The official explanation for the recent US import surge was companies stockpiling goods ahead of tariffs. Warehouses filled up. This looks negative from the perspective of GDP calculation and domestic economic churn. However, for the potential consumer, having access to more goods – potentially cheaper than they might be later – seems like a benefit. The availability of physical goods increased, enhancing the potential standard of living, even if domestic activity measured by GDP took a hit.
This highlights the limitations of using GDP as the sole barometer of economic health. It measures the pace of domestic production and spending, but not necessarily the outcome in terms of material well-being or access to goods. A country isn’t just a production machine; it’s also a place where people live and consume.
From the consumption and living standards perspective, the traditional GDP view can seem backward. Exports represent real output – goods and services made with domestic resources – being sent away. Imports represent real output from elsewhere being brought in for domestic use. When you buy that German car, the money leaves (the leakage), but the vehicle arrives (the material gain). The obsession with maximising (X-M) – the trade surplus – prioritises sending goods away over bringing them in.
Imagine a hypothetical Martian colony that imports everything it needs from Earth, paying in digital credits it can issue freely. Its domestic production (GDP) might be zero. The leakage would be total. Yet its citizens could enjoy a high standard of living. Would we call this economy a failure?
The ’export-led growth’ narrative often benefits corporations and financiers accumulating foreign currency, but does it always benefit the average citizen? They work to produce goods enjoyed elsewhere, while the potential gain from imports (lower prices, more choice) is sometimes downplayed or restricted.
The recent US data, viewed critically, shows an economy successfully acquiring vast amounts of the world’s output. Yes, the spending on these goods represents a leakage from the domestic income cycle, dampening the US growth cycle. However, the arrival of these goods represents a potential increase in material well-being. To call this ‘shrinkage’ without qualification is to mistake the measure of economic activity for a measure of national prosperity itself. Perhaps we need better ways to assess how well an economy is actually serving its people beyond the simple churn of domestic GDP.
Chat about this and any other MMT topics on Discord with the growing New Wayland community . New members can click this invite link which will add the server to your Discord account